The Energy Of The Universe

Readers may be wondering about any possible practical applications of the theory that explains so much about the nature of the universe that is as yet unexplained. The two Theories of Relativity led to a multitude of practical applications, including nuclear energy. If my theory is as correct as I am certain it is, why should not another jump in our understanding of the universe lead to a new source of energy?

I have come to believe that the theory I have introduced creates an opening to a source of energy like we have never seen before, as well as making it possible to access the outside dimensions that we know must exist.

In the posting "Gamma Ray Bursts" on this blog, it was explained how space will try to maintain symmetry whichever way is easiest. In the multi-dimensional checkerboard of alternating negative and positive charges, when a single particle or short string of particles is out of alignment with the background space and so disrupts the electric charge harmony, charge symmetry cannot be restored by any rearrangement of existing charges.

The only way for the universe to regain the all-important charge symmetry is to create new charges and I explained how a single charge led to the Big Bang that began the universe and a single short string of charges caused by broken electron strings leads to the Gamma Ray Bursts that occur about once a day, on average, throughout the universe. These events are hundreds of times more powerful than supernovas, exploding stars, and are the most powerful explosions to occur in the universe since the Big Bang.

These incredible bursts of energy occur when an orphan "sheet" of space forms due to charge reproduction in an effort by the universe to regain the charge symmetry that has been upset by the breaking of an electron string in two places close together, creating a short negatively-charged string of charges. It seems that the wrapping around the nucleus of an atom by these electron strings can stress the strings enough to cause an occasional snap. This occurs on a regular basis as physicists can detect electrons that seem to jump from one orbital to another without crossing the intervening space and this is the only logical explanation of this.

I got to wondering why we could not just create our own confined Gamma Ray Bursts. As I have explained in previous postings on this topic, matter and antimatter form due to the charge migration that occurs in a new sheet of space because a particle of one charge, either positive or negative, must come first. If we could create such a charge imbalance in a confined container, the matter and antimatter sides of the sheet of new space that would form and grow in an effort to regain charge symmetry would curve around and meet, creating a synthetic Gamma Ray Burst.

The electron snip, the short string produced by the two snaps, should be as short as possible so that the alternating charged particles of the sorrounding space cannot restore charge symmetry by mere redistribution, forcing new charges and the resulting sheet of space to come into existence. Remember that the snip will exist in time for only a fraction of a second from our point of view due to the movement of our consciousness along the bundles of strings composing our bodies and brains. This is supposedly how the engines operated on Star Trek, the creation of a vast amount of energy by the reaction of matter and antimatter.

My idea is to use an array of extremely tiny and close together fixed negative and positive charges. An electron, which is actually a string, will be fired into the maze of charges in a way similar to ordinary vacuum tubes. The reason that vacuum tubes do not cause electron strings to snap is because the electrons in the tubes move in straight lines. It may be desirable to give the container in which the reaction takes place a positive charge so that it does not react with the antimatter side of the new, growing space sheet.

The pulling on the negatively-charged electron by the positive charges and the pushing by the negative charges will subject the electron string to extreme stresses. The goal is to cause an electron string to snap twice within a short distance, creating the electron string "snip" that will force the universe to create new charges in order to regain the charge symmetry, which is much more important to the universe than energy. This is because the geometric arrangement of the alternating charges comprising space make this impossible by charge rearrangement.

This synthetic charge reproduction that can be such a fantastic source of energy, and that is probably within our present technical capabilities, will require a background of smooth space with it's alternating checkerboard of negative and positive charges. The presence of any matter will disrupt space and act as a control rod on the reaction. This is why the Big Bang has not reoccurred, only the smaller Gamma Ray Bursts. If there was no matter in the area, the sheet would not cause a Gamma Ray Burst until the matter and antimatter sides of the sheet came into contact when the sheet got massive enough to fold under it's own gravity.

CHARGE REVERSAL

There is another possible way to create our own Gamma Ray Burst by matter-antimatter reaction but I do not have a method of doing this yet. I will call it "Charge Reversal". If we could find a way to cause negative charges to become positive and vice-versa, we could divide a pile of garbage in half, reverse the charges in one half so that the matter became antimatter and then push the two together. Not only would we get a fantastic amount of energy but we would be rid of the garbage.

The electromagnetic bond would have the same effect if reversed. The charge reversal, when we can find a way to make it possible, will still conserve the overall balance of electric charges in the universe and will not break any basic laws that I can think of.

POSSIBLE TRAVEL IN OTHER DIMENSIONS?

The way I figure it, the newly forming sheet of space that we produce by charge imbalance will not be subject to the usual laws of momentum that govern motion and electromagnetic waves. Matter in motion or electromagentic waves can never move in a dimension of space unless that dimension is also represented in the force which produced the motion. But the new sheet of space should spread in random dimensions of space and I do not believe will be subject to this rule. I have described in the posting "Gamma Ray Bursts" how they must expand in random dimensions of space.

This means that our artificially-produced sheet of space will not only provide a fantastic amount of energy when it is confined by a positively-charged container to our familiar dimensions but will be able to provide us with some momentum to previously inaccessible dimensions when it is not confined. If the sheet spreads by chance into a dimension that is inaccesible to us and we can get it to push against a positively-charged barrier, it will provide us with previously unattainable momentum in that dimension. Keep in mind that to access other dimensions of space, we do not need full propulsion into those dimensions, only a little bit of momentum.

Never mind stepping onto the moon, what will it be like to step into some of the previously inaccesible dimensions that must exist? A dimensional traveller will have the same time delay as Einstein described in relativity. As I have pointed out in previous postings, the instantaneous particles that physicists observe all around us must be evidence of strings of matter that share only one dimension with us. This means that there must be extra-dimensional matter but travellers may enter a dimension without matter or electromagnetic waves. A dimensional traveller could not communicate with us by radio without special techniques.

Previously inaccessible dimensions provide the ultimate in stealth technology. Imagine giving outer dimensional momentum to a laser or other ray to knock incoming missiles into other dimensions. As long as the missile no longer shared any of our dimensions, it could explode right next to us and we would not even be aware of it.