Momentum And Strings

Today, I would like to develop momentum as proof that matter actually consists of strings in four-dimensional space instead of particles in three-dimensional space as we perceive. As I described in the theory, our consciousness moves along the bundle of strings that compose our bodies and brains at the speed we perceive as the speed of light.

Light and other electromagnetic radiation actually consists of stationary ripples in space caused by bends in strings. These strings and bundles of strings are aligned in space along that dimension of space that we cannot see but perceive as time so that we experience other bundles as strings as three-dimensional objects because we can only see in the plane perpendicular to the spatial dimension that we perceive as time.

Have you ever thought about how strange it is that if there is an object in outer space free of gravity and we apply a force to the object, the object will continue in the same direction even after the force is removed from it? The logic that governs all other aspects of physics seems to demand that the object would move as long as the force is applied to it but would stop when the force is removed. It is as if the force is "still with" the object regardless of when the force is removed.

What about falling objects? Suppose we drop a compact object from a high place, even though the force of gravity on it is constant, the speed of the object will increase until it hits the ground. Just as with the object in space, it is as if the force of gravity from earlier in the object's fall is "still with" the object throughout it's fall.

When an object is moved by a force, whether it is gravity or another force away from gravity, time makes no difference. When a force is applied to an object, that force is always with the object regardless of the passage of time after the removal of the force. As for the object in space, conventional newtonian physics tells us that if an object is in motion, it must always remain in motion until acted on by an outside force.

This is fine for everyday physics. But space itself must act upon a motionless object to keep it in place. If it were not, then objects in open space would spontanously move or relocate.

In my theory, I established that space must consist of infinitesimal alternating electric charges. This means that it is charge attraction and repulsion on the boundaries of an object in space that holds it in place until it is moved. But this means that, once again, while an object in open space could be moved by a force applied to it, the motion should cease when the force is discontinued.

Yet it does not, if there was a chunk of rock in space and a force is applied to it for five seconds, it will continue on forever in the same direction until acted on by another force. But yet if space clearly acts to hold a stationary object in place, why does it not resist the movement of the chunk of rock now that the force has been removed from it?

The answer is very simple but it requires a rearrangement of our understanding of reality. It requires acceptance of the Theory Of Stationary Space that I have presented. If the force, whether gravity on the falling object or the force on the rock in open space, is not acting on a three-dimensional object in three-dimensional space as we perceive it but bending a bundle of strings in four-dimensional space, then everything falls right into place.

As we move forward in what we perceive as time, the bend in the bundle remains after the force appears to us to have been discontinued. The reason that time is not a factor in momentum, whether in the falling object or the rock in free space is, of course, that it does not really exist, it is only something that we perceive. The bend caused by the force in what we perceive as the bundle's past is still with it and has affected it's directional orientation in space.

The reason that we perceive the speed of light as the maximum possible velocity anything can travel is that in terms of bending a bundle of strings, it is represented by a right angle bend and that is the maximum possible bend. I do not hesitate to state that if objects were composed of particles rather than strings as conventional science supposes, falling objects would fall at a constant rate and an object in open space moved by a force would remain still after the force was removed.